季度考核的英文自我评价 第1篇
In the use of direct superior performance evaluation system, the purpose of employee self-assessment is nothing more than two: 1, the fastest quantitative data sources can be quantified; 2, reflects the staff participation in performance appraisal; However, if the assessment of employees Assessment without a clear understanding of it, it will lead to significant deviation of the assessment results, or even failure. We know that the performance appraisal may be a variety of errors, such as the different leaders of different personal scales, the average tendency, etc., then the self-assessment link, which led to the factors that lead to errors it?
First, the personality of each person is different from the self-assessment scale is very different. For example, some employees self-confidence, their own evaluation of high, some people feel inferior, their evaluation on the low side. In addition, some people pursue perfection, strict requirements on their own, and some others have passed, these two categories of people to their own scale certainly different. Also, some old employees of the company and colleagues know very clearly, scoring when its capability, and new employees do not know other people's shallow depth, to their scoring when there is not much reference to speak of.
Second, psychological research shows that most people are overconfident."Do not make a normal fool," an example of this book mentioned that we often hear a lot of people say that they "not on the phase", that is, according to the photos did not look good. In fact, the photo is an objective reflection of our appearance, and each of us in the mirror when it will be special (and may be unconscious or habitual) to choose the best angle, that is more than a layer of subjective Factors in it, which led to our look in the mirror look better than the photos. So in fact, the staff part of the self-assessment on the provision of such a "mirror" to our staff to the beauty, this error which is self-evident.
Third, the staff self-assessment of the score, the assessment will do a great impact on the scoring. Have the experience of "bargain" people know that if you see the stall on a package, and my heart that probably worth 100, but the mouth asking price, the boss said 500, if you really want this package, bigMost people only dare to 300 or 400 pieces to cut. This is the so-called "anchor effect", the negotiation inside the "first offer, without anger in each other's situation, the higher the better" is the meaning, because the first bid will greatly grasp the initiative, so that the other psychological expectationsResulting in great changes. Employee self-assessment actually gave the examiner a chance to take the lead in the bidder, and whether the assessment due to face or other considerations, are likely to be the "quote" effect, so that the assessment results error. We in the actual work of human resources, but also did find this phenomenon, a company several departments staff performance appraisal scores, without exception, no less than its self-rated scores.
Based on the above analysis, we will find that the department leaders get the self-evaluation scores mixed with too many subjective factors, so that can not be filtered through technical means, and this score will have a great impact on the assessment; Confident employees have a high score, and sometimes due to the need for mandatory distribution, those who require their own strict, scoring low staff has become a victim, because their scoring low, the final score is difficult to be brought up leadership. In the assessment of the indicators can not quantify the more components, or different departments in different parts of the work of employees, the lack of uniform measure of the time, this situation is particularly serious.
So, companies in the performance evaluation of the actual operation, how to solve these problems I mentioned above? Many people may be from the "increase the proportion of quantifiable indicators," "to strengthen the assessment and assessment of those who training, But in practice, it will only increase the workload and complexity of performance appraisal, implementation easier said than done? In fact, just look back to see the implementation of the two purposes of self-evaluation .Self-evaluation and implementation of self-evaluation, , We will find a simple solution: the relatively objective quantifiable indicators, the implementation of "employee self-evaluation", while maintaining a "fast data source" - in fact only data sources, but also embodied in the form "Employee participation"; and not to quantify the subjective evaluation of indicators, the assessment by the direct scoring, do not give employees self-evaluation (and thus in this link error) opportunity.
We know that performance appraisal in human resources work is a huge project, the implementation of the highest cost, companies should seize the main contradiction, step by step, and in the initial stage, but not for the form of trapped. So is slightly Jun policy for some enterprises initially set up performance management system, simply cancel the self-evaluation session, thus avoiding the link error, but also to a certain extent reduce the workload and complexity of the assessment for the next Step smooth implementation of the well prepared.
Of course, the front said that the main business in the initial stage of performance management situation. When companies meet the following conditions: First, the implementation of the more smooth performance management, implementation costs can be effectively controlled; Second, the formation of a good performance within the company culture, we understand the performance management is more uniform, their own evaluation More objective; Third, the department leaders generally have a clear understanding of the lower levels and independent judgments; we can think that enterprises have entered the advanced stage. At this point to carry out a real staff self-assessment, it will further mobilize the enthusiasm of employees and the importance of performance, thus forming a virtuous circle of performance management.
季度考核的英文自我评价 第2篇
在政治思想方面，我坚定不移地拥护党制定的各项方针政策，学习五中全会会议精神。在师德方面虚心向老教师学习请教，从中学习高尚、严谨的教师风范。
在教育教学方面，我以严要求高标准来衡量自我，不断给自我施压，主动参加各级各类的教学活动。教学中，针对学生特点，以愉快式教学为主，不搞满堂灌，坚持学生为主体，教师为主导、教学为主线，注重讲练结合。同时，认真做好作业批改和辅导工作。
在纪律方面，本人严格遵守学校的各项规章制度，不迟到、不早退、有事主动请假。在工作中，尊敬领导、团结同事，能正确处理好与领导同事之间的关系。
在教学成绩方面，随着新课程改革对教师业务本事要求的提高，本人在教学之余，还挤时间自学中文本科并积极参加各类现代教育技术培训。教学成绩得到了教研组内其他教师的一致认可。我所带的班级，总体来说，成绩较好。
当然，作为一名青年教师，我在工作中还存在17种植煌晟浦处，俗话说：“金无足赤，人无完人。”在今后的工作中，我会“多学习、多动手、多思考、多评价、多反思”，以期更大的提高。
季度考核的英文自我评价 第3篇
20__年__社区在第一季度工作在，区政府区统计局的正确领导下，以创新求发展，使统计工作取得了新的进展和成效。现将工作评价如下：
一、领导重视、正确决策
1、社区党工委定期召开会议，研究统计工作，每季度定期召开计划统计工作专题研究会，听取统计工作汇报，在人、财、物上大力投入。坚持党政一把手亲自抓，分管领导各部门齐抓共管。梅塘社区在年初工作意见中明确了统计工作职责，并将履行统计职责分工情景纳入年度重点目标职责管理中，进一步完善和落实了履行统计职责分工职责制，强化了统计工作的综合治理机制。
2、强化基层队伍建设，明确社区统计员的工作职责，既做到各负其责，又做到共同配合，在社区构成了“纳入社区、深化教育、服务为主、综合治理”的统计工作新格局。一年两度的社区统计员业务培训，保证了统计工作的开展。定期与不定期的对社区进行排查摸底，日常走访、发放宣传品等实质性工作，将基础工作和管理服务做在日常，大大提高了对社区企业及个体业户数量及质量的掌握。为后期开展打下了良好的基础。
二、深化改革，建立属地管理
以统计工作基础建设为重点，加强分类指导和动态管理，规范工作程序，落实管理措施，实现统计工作由管理主导型向服务主导型的转变。全面推进统计工作管理体制改革，建立单位负责、属地管理、社区服务的新体制。
1、认真贯彻落实各部门履行职责分工职责制，全面落实单位法定代表人(负责人)统计工作职责制。年初，我们对辖区企业、个体工商业户进行了排查摸底，根据各单位实际情景有针对性的进行帮忙和指导，使属地管理、单位负责落到实处。
2、加强统计工作计算机管理质量，以科学手段到达科学管理的目的。首先，我们加强对辖区工商业户的管理，每月到工商、税务了解新注册、注销的企业，并全部进行了微机录入。
三、加强阵地建设，确保工作顺利开展
进一步加强阵地建设，发挥社区资源的综合优势，建立了多渠道、多形式、服务主体多元化的统计工作体系
1、社区统计人员确保一人一机并保证了网络畅通，配备电话机、打印机、办公柜等相关办公设施。
2、为社区统计人员配备统计标牌、文件盒、文件夹，独立宣传栏等。
四、职能联动，实现信息共享
社区定期召开各职能部门联席会议，使各单位承担起职责，各司其职，相互配合。工商、税务及时供给名录库资料，工商、公安协助进行市场、个体户清查摸底。切实加强行政管理资料交换、信息共享、普查沟通和协调等工作。
五、依法管理，确保数据的准确性
随着统计工作的要求越来越高，为使统计工作更加轨道化，更加法制化，工作中我们处处以学习宣传贯彻统计法为先导，以执行统计法为重点，全面提高依法行政水平。
社区统计员能够熟悉和掌握统计法等相关法规条例的基本资料及指示精神，从而进一步提高了统计员对政策法规的掌握和运用本事，防止上报数据出现瞒、漏、迟报现象的发生。
六、强化全局意识，进取努力完成上级下达各项指标任务
在20__年第一季度，__社区统计员努力协调各相关职能部门关系，克服种.种困难，确保上级普查任务按时、保量的完成。进取协调企业，参与上级部门组织的统计上岗、继续教育培训;
七、存在问题下个季度工作打算
1、在区划调整后，对辖区企业的管理与服务还存在漏洞。将进一步进行规范化管理。
2、信息管理不够完善。将创新工作方法，建立社区统计信息网络平台，使信息数据部门共享。
3、克服经济普查清查阶段问题，全力以赴完成经济普查工作任务。
在今后的工作中，我们将进一步增强业务知识，扎实有效地做好基层基础工作，抓好各项制度的落实，努力提升统计工作的管理和服务水平，使社区统计工作再上新台阶。
以上就是我们__社区，第一季度的工作评价，请领导批评指正。